Author(s)

Sri. Panchadarla appalakonda

  • Manuscript ID: 140266
  • Volume: 2
  • Issue: 6
  • Pages: 400–402

Subject Area: Arts and Humanities

Abstract

This article examines Girish Karnad’s Nagamandala (1988) as a feminist counter-text to the shastric tragedy of Hayavadana (1971). It argues that Rani’s agency is constituted through folk form, architectural privacy, and oblique speech. Using Hélène Cixous’ écriture féminine, Luce Irigaray’s labial politics, and Michel Foucault’s Panopticon, the study demonstrates that the locked room, initially a carceral space, becomes the site of female authorship. Rani’s performative utterance “He is a god” rewrites pativrata dharma into swaraj. The anthill trial is analyzed as a folk courtroom where oral law defeats Manu-based law. The article concludes that Karnad’s feminism here is not liberal but folk feminist: it weaponizes invisibility and orality to secure female sovereignty. The final closed door signifies privacy as the highest dharma, repositioning Karnad as a playwright who uses folk not for authenticity but as political technology.

Keywords
Girish KarnadNagamandalaFolk FeminismÉcriture FémininePanopticonPativrata DharmaPrivacyOblique AgencyIndian Drama