Author(s)
Chandilson A. Sangma
- ISSN (P): 3139-8464
- Manuscript ID: 141079
- Volume: 2
- Issue: 10
- Pages: 275–287
Subject Area: Sociology and Anthropology
Abstract
Northeast India is one of the most culturally, ethnically, linguistically, and ecologically diverse regions of India and occupies a strategically significant position because of its international borders and connections with South and Southeast Asia. At the same time, the region has experienced prolonged insurgency, ethnic tensions, demands for autonomy, identity-based mobilization, resource disputes, displacement, and institutional challenges. These conditions have affected social cohesion, public trust, and the inclusiveness of development. This article examines conflict resolution and peace-building in Northeast India in the context of India’s long-term vision of Viksit Bharat 2047. Drawing on conflict transformation, participatory peace-building, restorative justice, and positive peace, it critically considers major peace initiatives and negotiated settlements, including the Mizo Accord, Shillong Accord, Bodo peace processes, the NSCN (IM) Framework Agreement, the Karbi Anglong Agreement, and the Tripura Peace Agreement. The paper argues that durable peace cannot be secured merely through the cessation of armed violence or the signing of political agreements. It requires meaningful political inclusion, accountable governance, socio-economic opportunity, cultural recognition, justice, reconciliation, and sustained participation by affected communities. The continuing crisis in Manipur further demonstrates the consequences of delayed intervention, fragile inter-community trust, contested identity, and inadequate reconciliation mechanisms. The paper proposes an integrated framework connecting peace-building with participatory governance, institutional strengthening, youth and women’s engagement, restorative processes, sustainable livelihoods, cultural preservation, responsible security governance, and cross-border cooperation. It concludes that peace should be treated as a continuous social and institutional process rather than a single political settlement. Such an approach can help transform Northeast India from a region frequently described through the lens of conflict into a region of resilience, cooperation, innovation, and inclusive development, thereby contributing substantially to the aspirations of Viksit Bharat 2047.